냐컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴� +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ 栢栢栢栢昉께께굇굇굅같�|O|u|t|b|r|e|a|k|臍같굇굇굉께께栢栢栢� +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Issue #3 - Page 5 of 12 냐컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴� Disproving Evolution: In all of these underground e-zines I am always finding texts bashing creationalist ideas. These texts almost never contain any credible evidence that have not already been disproven. This is why i wrote this text, just simply to use scientific evidence to disprove evolution (being one of the main THEORIES that people hold on to just to down creatioalist beliefs) The information below will prove evolution is just another ignorant theory with nothing to back its claims. Where has evolution ever been observed? It involves changes in size, shape, color, and minor genetic alterations caused by one or two mutations over a long period of time, so how could the theory of evolution ever been observed? Do you realize how complex living things are? Textbooks show an evolutionary tree, but where is its trunk and where are its branches? If there is no trunk or branches in the evolutionary tree, how did the first creatures appear in order for the theory of evolution to take place? These are all questions evolutionists should ask themselves, because there is simply no compelling evidence explaining any of these. Well, if none of these questions can be answered, how can evolution possibly be a credible theory? Most insects go through a complete metamorphosis; such as when a caterpillar builds a cocoon around itself. Its body inside then disintegrates into a thick, pulplike liquid. After the adult insect emerges it becomes a completely different insect than it was in its larval stage. These changes make the insect amazingly capable, and often beautiful, such as a butterfly. Food, habitat, and behavior of the larva also differ drastically from the adult. Evolution claims that mutations slightly alter an organism's genetic material, which later generations inherit. On rare occasions the alterations are beneficial, enabling the offspring to reproduce more of themselves and the improved genetic material after many generations, dramatic changes, even new organs, accumulate. If this were true, each organism must be able to reproduce and must be superior, in some sense, to its ancestors. How then could insects or any other creature evolve over time in many stages, which, in fact, are what evolution states. The simplest conceivable form of single-celled life should have at least 600 different protein molecules. The mathematical probability that only one typical protein could form by chance arrangements of amino acid sequences is far less than 1 in 10(450) (10 with an exponent of 450). To appreciate the magnitude of 10(450), realize that the visible universe is about 10(28) inches in diameter. With these kinds of mathematical odds against evolution, what scientific fact could be stated to outweigh this evidence? Textbooks show a diagram of an ape gradually forming a human over time. Yet how was that first monkey created? The first layers of sedimentary rock contain many fossils of complex creatures, such as fish, worms, and coral. What makes this strong evidence of creation is the fact these animals just appeared suddenly. Not even the slightest of gradual change in appearance over time. I hope that this shows you all that you should always get the facts from both sides before you make any decisions about what you are going to spend your entire life believing. If you have any questions or comments please feel free to contact me. Ryan Gibson (ryan@insidergaming.net) (http://www.insidergaming.com)