###################################################################### ## [PRE-dystopia -dropcode] ## ## there's no such thing as paranoia... just damn good thinkin' ## ###################################################################### ---------------------------------------------------------------------- :: disclaimer :: withdrawal of responsibility ---------------------------------------------------------------------- i hereby disclaim all liability to, and warn all readers of, the perils this text may inflict upon its readers. the purpose and main function of a Government is to maintain social and economical stability within their society. in order for this to occur they must self-perpetuate at the cost of anything but there objectives. the path to social stability is often littered with means that would be more than frowned upon by society if they could only see it in clearer light. however, if a few individuals began noticing the elements of stabalization deeply embedded into everyday life, they would be a threat to the self-perpetuating power structure that is our Government. and the elimination of a few individuals is an infinitesimal perplexity in the grand scheme of political evolution. nonetheless, i pray you understand that the notions expressed herein are important and should be made as big as they can be. and lest we perish, our legacy will forever be. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- :: explanation :: wtf? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- it's been a prevailing and repetitive scenario dating back hundreds of thousands of years. societies reigned over by the highest caste of the social hierarchy. as far as history can tell, people have always followed leaders. society has always had standards to split up people into different catagories; knowns and unknowns, haves and havenots. but who sets these standards? who determines, by what perogative, who has and who has not? i can already hear the legions of readers echoing, 'the individual...dual...ual...al...l...' well, i'm here to tell you, friends: that is not entirely true. this text will explain that Governments, as the ruling caste, have and have had but two objectives: civilize and stabilize... at any cost. even the cost of our civil liberties. as i am not duly equiped to explain these concepts to there fullest, i suggest those who are interested read George Orwell's 1984, Aldous Huxley's Brave New World and Brave New World Revisited, Ray Bradbury's Fahrenheit 451, Eugene Zamiatin's We and any other books in the dystopian genre that you can find. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- :: american truths :: sharp contrasts ---------------------------------------------------------------------- when the Taliban attacks america, that is terrorism. when america attacks the Taliban, that is retaliation. when the Taliban responds with further attacks on our great nation, they are terrorizing again. when we respond with further attacks on their nation, we're retaliating again. if you make a fuss over civilian casualties caused by the american government, you are aiding in the dissemination of terrorist propaganda. however, when civilians are killed by haters of our mighty nation, the perpetrators are evil and those deaths are tragedies. When they put bombs in cars and kill our people, they're uncivilized killers. When we put bombs on missiles and kill their people, we're upholding civilized values. When they kill, they're terrorists. When we kill, we're striking against terror. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- :: osama bin laden :: a beacon for animosity ---------------------------------------------------------------------- in the 80's, osama bin laden was a ruthless killer. he led attacks against the soviets in an attempt to force them out of afghanistan. the united states were a beneficiary of the war between osama's followers and the soviet occupiers of afghanistan so america aided osama's army with munitions and training. in the all american opinion, osama was good. in 2001, osama bin laden was a ruthless killer. thousands of american citizens were murdered in cold blood at the hands of osama's zealous, fanatic following. in the all american opinion, osama is evil. in order for a civilization to exist, survive and prosper there must be an organized stability of society. in order for this to be achieved the ruling caste must hold a certain amount of control over the people. in a society where the doctrines of the government are declared and understood as democratic, the masses have a sense of security in knowing that they have a voice, and they play a part. the frightening truth is, osama is whatever our loving leader says he is. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- the american government declared this war and bush has described it as intemporal without geographical bounds. and i fear. greets.........gr3p.rambo.ex.klep.lexi.jennie.digi.smiley.anti.adeamis