UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) No. 98-50241 ) Plaintiff-Appellee, ) DC# CR-95-881-MRP ) Central California vs. ) ) ORDER KEVIN DAVID MITNICK, ) ) Defendant-Appellant. ) ) ________________________________________) Before: SCHROEDER, TROTT AND FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges Appellant's motion for revocation of the district court's pretrial detention order is denied. The government was shown, by a preponderance of evidence, that appellant constitutes a flight risk and that, therefore, there is no condition or combination of conditions which will reasonably assure appellant's appearance. See 18 U.S.C. 3142(e). The government also has shown, by clear and convincing evidence, that appellant poses a danger to the community. See United States v. Reynolds, 956 F.2d 192 (9th Cir. 1992). The district court's detention order is AFFIRMED.